High Court of Madras issued a writ of mandamus directing the respondent corporation to consider the petitioners' representation dated 07.10.2017 regarding employment under the land losers priority quota within twelve weeks.
Directed first respondent to consider representation for employment under priority quota and pass orders within twelve weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :07.03.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.6526 of 2019
and
W.M.P.No7335 of 2019
1.K.Raja 2.K.Dhanraj ..Petitioners
-Vs-
..Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to consider the representation of the
1st petitioner dated 07.10.2017 seeking employment for the second petitioner in the light of the judgment rendered in Writ Petition No.23718 of 2017 dated 12.09.2017.
For Petitioners : Mr.M.S.Soundara rajan
For Respondents : Mr.Satish Rajan Central Government Standing counsel for R3
Mr.A.N.Thambidurai
Special Government Pleader for R4 to R6
The immovable property belongs to the family of the writ petitioners were acquired by the respondents for the purpose of allotting the same to the Neyveli Lignite Corporation. Thus, the writ petitioner is entitled to avail the priority Quota under the Land losers category.
2.The grievances of the writ petitioner is that he is fully qualified for appointment and he submitted an application to consider his case for providing an appointment under the Priority Quota allotted for Land losers category. In this regard, the writ petitioner submitted a representation on 07.10.2017, which is yet to be considered.
3.Thus, without going into the merits of the matter, the 1st respondent is directed to consider the representation submitted by the writ petitioner on 07.10.2017 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petitioner is directed to enclose the copy of the representation and all other relevant documents, if any, along with the order passed in the present writ petition.
4.With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
kak
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the first respondent is directed to consider the petitioners' representation for employment under the priority quota for land losers.
Whether the petitioners are entitled to priority quota for employment as beneficiaries of land acquisition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Raja
K.Dhanraj
N.L.C. India Limited
The General Manager
The Union of India
The State of Tamil Nadu
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
