Dismissed

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. the Central

Madras HC4 Nov 2019WP/6222/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged an order of the Central Information Commissioner directing disclosure of exam marks. During hearing, the petitioner showed the mark list was already produced to the candidate, rendering adjudication unnecessary. The court dismissed the petition without elaboration on legal principles.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed; connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs the Central — RTI and Transparency | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 04.11.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

W.P.No.6222 of 2009

¶6

and M.P.No.2 of 2009

¶7

United India Insurance Co. Ltd., rep. by its Deputy General Manager, 24, Whites Road, Chennai 600 014

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

The Central Information Commission, 2nd floor, "B"Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066.

¶10

Sri R.K.Sirova, C/o. United India Insurance Co.Ltd., 801, G.T. Road, Panipat 132 103 ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent relating to his proceedings in F.No.CIC/AT/A/2008/01067 dated 30th January 2009 and the order passed by the first respondent in the review petition in case no.CIC/AT/A/2008/01067 dated 24th March 2009 and quash the same.

¶12

This writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the first respondent Central Information Commissioner directing the writ petitioner to provide the marks secured by the candidates, who had appeared for the written test for departmental promotion.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

Today when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner produced a copy of the mark list obtained by the candidates, who have attended the examination.

¶15

In the above circumstances, since the marks have been furnished to the second respondent, nothing survives to adjudicate in this writ petition.

¶16

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner has any grievance over the marks awarded to him, it is always open to him to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VI)

¶18

//True Copy//

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

mrp

¶21

¶22

The Central Information Commission, 2nd floor, "B"Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066.

¶23

+1cc to Mr.V.Perumal, Advocate Sr.91588

¶24

W.P.No.6222 of 2009

¶25

jp[co] srg 21/01/2020

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. the Central

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. the Central

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.K.Lakshmanan Vs the Manager(Sales)

Itc Ltd, Virginia House, 37 Vs the District Collector

R. Prema Vs State Election Commission

Poovaiee Ammal Vs the Collector

R.Doss Vs Ministry of Railways

Hotel Ennordee International Vs State Industries Promotion