Dismissed

M.Tamilarasi v. The District Collector

Madras HC4 Mar 2019WP/5993/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed for mandamus to direct respondents to consider petitioners representation for patta. Court discharged petition, holding further representation futile due to defective survey number, granting liberty to rectify documents or seek declaration in civil court.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with liberty to petitioner to rectify survey number or approach Civil Court; no costs.

M.Tamilarasi Vs The District Collector — Madras HC (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 04.03.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

¶5

W.P.No.5993 of 2019

¶6

M.Tamilarasi ...Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The District Collector,
Chennai District, Office of the District Collectorate,
Singaravelar Maligai,
Kamarajar Salai, Chennai.
2. The Tahsildar,
Ayanavaram Taluk,
Chennai – 600102. ...Respondents

¶9

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.10.2018 or to pass any other order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances.

¶10

Mr.E.Balamurugan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent of the parties, this main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶11

The petitioner seeks for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider her representation dated 15.10.2018, wherein and whereby, she sought for patta in respect of the vacant land in Survey No.125, measuring an extent of 2400 sq.ft, situated at Chinna Chembarambakkam Village, Ayanavaram Taluk, Chennai District.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

It is seen that the Tahsildar, by proceedings dated 04.01.2018 has already informed the petitioner that the perusal of the revenue records would show that the property, for which, the petitioner seeks for patta situated at Survey No.124 Part and hence, she has to get her documents rectified in respect of the said Survey No.124. The petitioner neither questions the said proceedings dated 04.01.2018 nor taken any steps to get the Survey Number rectified. Therefore, I do not think, one more representation before the Tahsildar, will serve any purpose.

¶14

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of by
granting liberty to the petitioner to workout her remedy in a
manner known to law, to get the Survey number rectified in her
document or seek for declaration in respect of the property in
which she is in possession and enjoyment before the Competent
Civil Court. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sni/mk
To
1. The District Collector,
Chennai District, Office of the District Collectorate,
Singaravelar Maligai,
Kamarajar Salai, Chennai.
2. The Tahsildar,
Ayanavaram Taluk,
Chennai – 600102.
+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.20540
+2cc to Mr.G.Mohanarangan, Advocate Sr.20337
W.P.No.5993 of 2019
sai[co]
srg 27/03/2019

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Tamilarasi v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Tamilarasi v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Blue Diamond Sports Entertainment Vs Superintendent of Police

Jubbili Sports and Vs State rep by

M/s.Sri Sai Ganesh Industry Vs The Tamil Nadu Small

M.Chinnapaiyan Vs Indian Oil Corp. Ltd., Rep. by

D.P.Veeramarthandan Vs The Commissioner

R.Thangamani Vs The Tahsildar