Disposed

P.Rabinson v. The Indian Bank

Madras HC18 Nov 2019WP/5483/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Writ Petition sought a direction to process an educational loan application for the second year of the petitioner's B.Pharm course. The Court accepted the bank's submission that no loan could be sanctioned for the first year due to lack of application, but directed disbursement for subsequent years.

What did the court decide?

The Bank was directed to ensure disbursement of the loan amount for the second, third, and fourth years of the course to the College.

P.Rabinson Vs The Indian Bank — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.11.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

¶5

W.P. No. 5483 of 2019

¶6

P. Rabinson ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Indian Bank, Represented by Zonal Officer, Zonal Office, 3^rd Floor, A.V.R Tower, No.4, Bharathy Road, Cuddalore – 607 001. 2. The Indian Bank, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Alathur Branch, No.55, Main Road, Alathur Post, Sankarapuram Taluk, Villuppuram District, Pin – 606 208. ... Respondents

¶7

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issue of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Second Respondent to process the educational loan application of the Petitioner bearing No.ID No. 208641 dated 27.05.2018 and disburse forthwith to the Petitioner a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- for B.Pharm course at Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Para Medical Sciences, within a time limit stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

¶8

For Petitioner: Mr. Ravikumar J For Respondents: Mrs. S.R. Sumathy O R D E R

¶9

Heard Mr. J. Ravikumar, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mrs. S.R. Sumathy, Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

The Petitioner is pursuing B.Pharm., Course for the academic years 2017-2021 in Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Para Medical Sciences, Coimbatore, for which he had made an application for educational loan to the Respondents. As the same had not been sanctioned, this Writ Petition has been filed to direct the Second Respondent to process the loan application and disburse the loan amount.

¶12

Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents, on instructions, states that the Petitioner had made an application for education loan on 27.05.2018 during the second year of the course of study and the educational loan has been sanctioned from that year (2018-2019) of the course of study onwards and that the amount would be paid directly to the College where the Petitioner is studying. It is further stated that since the application had not been made during the first year (2017-2018) of the course of study, it would not be possible to sanction educational loan insofar as that academic year is concerned. The aforesaid submission made deserve acceptance.

¶13

The Respondents shall ensure to disburse the loan amount for the second, third and fourth years of the course of study to the College directly on the due dates and necessary intimation in that regard shall be sent to the Petitioner under written acknowledgement.

¶14

The Writ Petition is disposed on the aforesaid terms. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar maya/vjt

¶15

+1cc to Mrs. S.R. Sumathy, Advocate SR.No.95686 +1cc to Mr.J.Ravikumar, Advocate SR.No.96613

¶16

W.P. No. 5483 of 2019

¶17

RP(CO) GMY(24/01/2020)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Rabinson v. The Indian Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Rabinson v. The Indian Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tmt.Manickam Vs The Motor Accident Claims

M.Thirunavukarasu, Vs The District Collector

K.S. Shanmugam Vs The Commissioner of Geology

S.Moorthy Vs The District Collector

Pushpalatha Vs The Regional Manager

K.M.Azeem Vs The Branch Manager