The High Court of Madras dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. The petitioner claimed the relief sought was no longer viable since the underlying dispute had become satisfiable. The petition is dismissed without costs.
Dismissal of writ petition as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS DATED: 20.06.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
W.P.No.4419 of 2009 & M.P.No.1 of 2009
K.Lalitha
...Petitioner
Vs
The Commissioner, Gudiyatham Municipality, Gudiyatham, Vellore District. ...Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned property tax - final notice in respect of tax assessment No.18272 issued by the respondent herein and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.E.Durai Vaiyapuri for Mr.N.Manokaran
For Respondent : Mr.R.Thirugnanam
Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned representing counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the present writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
hvk
To
The Commissioner, Gudiyatham Municipality, Gudiyatham, Vellore District.
+1cc to Mr.R.Thirugnanam, Advocate, S.R.No.50966
W.P.No.4419 of 2009 & M.P.No.1 of 2009 NRL(CO) RRS(31/07/2019)
K.Lalitha
Commissioner, Gudiyatham Municipality
M.S. Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
