R. Sundrm v. the Colecor of Chennai
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed by R.Sundaram against revenue authorities and NH Board dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in court sessions.
Writ petition filed by R.Sundaram against revenue authorities and NH Board dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in court sessions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.04.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA
W.P.No.35146 of 2007
R.Sundaram .. Petitioner
Vs
1.The Collector of Chennai,
Collectorate, Rajaji Salai,
Chennai.
2.The Tahsildar,
Purasawakkam-Perambur Taluk,
Perambur, Chennai – 11.
3.The District Revenue Officer,
Chennai Collectorate,
Rajaji Salai, Chennai.
4.The Tamil Nadu Housing Board,
Rep. By its Chairman,
No.331, Anna Salai,
Nandanam, Chennai – 35. .. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to forbear the respondents or their authorities claiming on their behalf in any way interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land and building bearing Door No.23, Navalar Nagar, Anna Nagar West Extension, Chennai, comprised in Old Survey No.162/2, Plot No.22, Now T.S.No.6, Block No.38, having total extent of 1320 square feet, belonging to the petitioner and consequently to direct the respondents to restore the building and structure as stood prior to 21.09.2007 of the said land to direct the respondents joint or severally to pay the compensation of Rs.15,00,000/- for demolition and destruction of the said property.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.Ravikumar, AGP For R4 : Mr.R.Bharathkumar, Standing Counsel
ORDER
When the matter was taken up in the morning session, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and again, when the matter is called in the afternoon session, no one has represented for the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No Costs. M.P.No.1 of 2007 is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rkm
To
1.The Collector of Chennai,
Collectorate, Rajaji Salai,
Chennai.
2.The Tahsildar,
Purasawakkam-Perambur Taluk,
Perambur, Chennai – 11.
3.The District Revenue Officer,
Chennai Collectorate,
Rajaji Salai, Chennai.
4.The Chairman,
The Tamil Nadu Housing Board,
No.331, Anna Salai,
Nandanam, Chennai – 35.
+1cc to Mr.R.Bharathkumar, Advocate, S.R.No.35641 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.36310 W.P.No.35146 of 2007 GJ(CO) RRS(31/05/2019)
R.Sundaram
The Collector of Chennai
The Tahsildar, Purasawakkam-Perambur Taluk
The District Revenue Officer, Chennai Collectorate
The Tamil Nadu Housing Board
T.RAJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court