Allowed

A.Anandan v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC6 Feb 2019WP/3455/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order directs the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation regarding his street vending shop near Aliyar Dam Park. The court granted a conditional direction to respond within two weeks without expressing an opinion on the merits and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to consider petitioner's representation on merits and pass orders within two weeks.

A.Anandan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Property and Title | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 06.02.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

¶5

WP.No.3455 of 2019 and WMP.No.3760 of 2019

¶6

A. Anandan ... Petitioner
Vs
1. The State of Tamil Nadu
rep. by its District Collector
Coimbatore District
Coimbatore.
2. The Sub Collector
Pollachi Revenue Department
Pollachi.
3. The Executive Engineer
Public Welfare Department
Aliyar Water Supply
Pollachi.
4. Executive Officer
Kottur Panchayat
Coimbatore. ... Respondents

¶7

Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.12.2018 and permit me to run the Street Vending shop near the Aliyar Dam Park, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District.

¶8

For Petitioner : Dr. S. Manoharan
For Respondents: Mr. B. Anand
Government Advocate

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

The prayer in the Writ Petition is to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.12.2018 and permit the petitioner to run the Street Vending shop near the Aliyar Dam Park, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is running the vending shop without littering and polluting the areas, maintaining cleanliness, complied with Section 15 of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act 2014. The petitioner was running the vending shop with proper licence and identity card issued by the Town Vending Committee according to Section 6 of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act 2014 and hence he was allowed to continue his sales near to the Aliyar dam park. The PWD Department who is maintaining the said park, is attempting to remove the shops from the above place. Therefore, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court, seeking the aforesaid prayer.

¶13

Considering the limited scope of prayer sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is inclined to direct the 3^rd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.12.2018, on merits and in accordance with law and pass orders as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to state that the petitioner is at liberty to submit a fresh representation along with a copy of this order to the 3^rd respondent.

¶14

The Writ Petition is disposed of, with the above direction at the stage of admission itself. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No order as to costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶15

//True Copy//

¶16

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶17

avr

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

¶20

The District Collector Coimbatore District Coimbatore.

¶21

The Sub Collector
Pollachi Revenue Department
Pollachi.
3. The Executive Engineer
Public Welfare Department
Aliyar Water Supply
Pollachi.
4. Executive Officer
Kottur Panchayat
Coimbatore.
+1cc to Dr. S. Manoharan, Advocate sr.no.10198
WP.No.3455 of 2019
and
WMP.No.3760 of 2019
ks(co)
nr 18/03/2019

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Anandan v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Anandan v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohamed Suhail, Vs the Home Secretary

H.Y.Ahmed Sait Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

R. Shanthi Vs the Secretary

Gururaj Vs The District Collector

S.Venkatesan Vs The District Collector

R.Ramachandran, Vs The Regional Transport Officer