The petitioner sought a writ to quash a goods detention notice. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as the prayer had become infructuous following an endorsement by the petitioner's counsel, noting there shall be no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :10.01.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.33394 of 2006
M/s Kumar Mahendra Exim
vs
The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer,
Rowing Squad,
Chingleput .. Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in G.D.No.12/2006-2007, quash the goods detention notice dated 07.09.2006 issued therein and further direct the respondent to release the goods detained under G.D.No.12/2006-2007 dated 07.09.2006.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner made a submission that the prayer in this writ petition has already became infructuous and he had also made an endorsement to that effect.
Assistant Registrar(CS viii)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ska/kmm To
The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Rowing Squad, Chingleput
A.SK(26/02/2019)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to the petitioner's endorsement.
M/s Kumar Mahendra Exim
The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
