Disposed

R.MahaLakshmi, v. The District Revenue Officer (Stamp Duty)

Madras HC5 Dec 2019WP/32987/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a common prayer order, the Court fixed a date for the First Respondent to dispose of proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Stamp Rules regarding valuation objections. The Court directed the revenue officer to ensure weekly progress, provide full hearing opportunities, and file a compliance report by the deadline.

What did the court decide?

Order fix for disposal of Section 4 proceedings under Tamil Nadu Stamp Rules; direct First Respondent to ensure weekly hearings, give full opportunity, and file reasoned order and compliance report by

R.MahaLakshmi, Vs The District Revenue… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.12.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

¶5

W.P. Nos. 32987, 32989, 32991 and 32992 of 2019 and WMP.Nos.33421, 33423, 33425 and 33426 of 2019

¶6

R.Mahalakshmi ... Petitioner in WP.32987/19 Kanaka ... Petitioner in WP.32989/19 K.Amirtham ... Petitioner in WP.32991/19 L.Saravanan ... Petitioner in WP.32992/19

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The District Revenue Officer (stamp duty) Office of District Collector, 5th Floor, Singaravelar Maaligai, No.32, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.

¶9

The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar Office, Kundrathur, Chennai - 600 069. ... Respondents in all the writ petitions

¶10

Common Prayer : - Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent herein to dispose of the proceedings initiated under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Stamp (prevention of Under Valuation of Instruments) Rues 1968 vide proceedings Na.Ka,.No.31/A4/2015 dated 30.09.2015 pursuant to the objection of the petitioner dated 28.10.2015.

¶11

For Petitioners: Mr.G.Nagarajan, (in all the cases) For Respondents: Mr.T.M.Pappiah, (for R1 and R2) (Special Government Pleader)

¶12

COMMON ORDER

¶13

These Writ Petitions have been filed by the Petitioners for directing the First Respondent to dispose of the proceedings initiated under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Stamp (Prevention of

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Under Valuation of Instruments) Rules, 1968, vide proceedings Na.Ka.No.31/A4/2015 dated 30.09.2015 pursuant to the objections of the Petitioner dated 28.10.2015.

¶16

Learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the First and Second Respondents, on instructions, submits that the enquiry in the aforesaid cases has been fixed on 23.12.2019 before the First Respondent and that individual notice have also been issued to the parties concerned.

¶17

The Petitioner and other concerned parties shall attend the hearing on the said date as well as on the subsequent dates to which it is adjourned and extend their co-operation for the expeditious disposal of the matter. It shall be ensured that there is atleast one effective hearing every week showing progress of the case. The First Respondent, after giving full opportunity of hearing to all parties concerned, shall consider each of their contentions and pass reasoned order on merits and in accordance with law and communicate the decision taken to them under written acknowledgment and file report of such compliance before the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court by 31.03.2020.

¶18

Assistant Registrar (CO)

¶19

//True Copy//

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶21

tsh/arb

¶22

¶23

The District Revenue Officer (stamp duty) Office of District Collector, 5th Floor, Singaravelar Maaligai, No.32, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.

¶24

The Sub Registrar Sub Registrar Office, Kundrathur, Chennai - 600 069.

¶25

+1cc to Mr.G.Nagarajan, Advocate, S.R.No. 1688

¶26

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 102512

¶27

W.P. No. 32987 of 2019

¶28

MR(CO) GN(31/01/2020)

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.MahaLakshmi, v. The District Revenue Officer (Stamp Duty)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.MahaLakshmi, v. The District Revenue Officer (Stamp Duty)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Pradeepan Vs The District Collector

Sasikumar Vs The Sub Registrar

A.Amirtharaj Vs The Chennai Metro Water Supply

G.Selvakumaran Vs The Inspector General of Registration

R.Muthusamy Vs the District Collector

J.NirmalaDevi, Vs The Sub Registrar