V.Chandru v. the Sub Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court rejected the petitioner's writ petition for restoration of a patta, finding no merit because the petitioner had already sold the disputed property by a registered sale deed before filing the petition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.08.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.31218 of 2007
and
M.P.No.3 of 2007
V.Chandru ...Petitioner
Vs
1.The Sub Collector,
Hosur,
Krishnagiri District.
2.The Tahsildar,
Hosur, Krishnagiri District.
3.Anandaprasad ...Respondents
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified
Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the first
respondent in Proc.No.Na.Ka.7741/06/A4, dated 20.12.2006 and
quash the same as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction
and further direct the respondents 1 and 2 to restore he
petitioner's name in the revenue records in respect of the
property situated in S.No.38/1A5 and S.No.38/1C5,
Singasadanapally Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari
For Respondents: Mr.I.Sathish,
Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.M.D.Thirunavukarasu for R3 O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking restoration of patta in the petitioner's name has merits given that the petitioner had sold the property to third parties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Chandru
- respondent
The Sub Collector, Hosur
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Hosur
- respondent
Anandaprasad
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court