The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing of his writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.30961 of 2007
S.Mohanraj
..Petitioner
Vs
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.4/2007 E.2, dated 07.05.2007 and to quash the same and to forbear the respondents from initiating any action against the petitioner pursuant to the order passed by the 3rd respondent dated 07.05.2007 as disturbing the lawful possession and enjoyment of peaceful possession by the petitioner.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.K.Chandrasekaran for R1
Mr.M.Maharaja Special Government Pleader HR & CE for R2 & R3 Mr.B.Anand Government Advocate for R4
O R D E R
When the case was listed for hearing on 09.07.2019 there was no representation for the petitioner. Even today there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
s/dAssistant Registrar
True Copy
NR(CO) SP(05/08/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Mohanraj
Executive Officer, Rajagoplasamy Thirukoil, Cuddalore
Assistant Commissioner, H.R. & C.E. Cuddalore
Joint Commissioner, H.R.& C.E., Myladuthurai
Station House Officer, Cuddalore N.T.Police Station, Cuddalore
K.KALYANASUNDARAM
Justice
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
