Disposed

E.Murugan v. The President

Madras HC1 Nov 2019WP/30561/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society to consider the petitioner's representation for reinstatement in the post of night watchman. The court fixed a period of twelve weeks for the society to pass orders on merits after providing due opportunity.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider petitioner's representation for reinstatement and pass appropriate orders on merits within twelve weeks.

E.Murugan Vs The President — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :01.11.2019 CORAM

¶2

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No. 30561 of 2019

¶3

E.Murugan ..Petitioner

¶4

¶5

The President Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society, Kallakurichi Taluk and District.

¶6

The Secretary,

¶7

Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society,

¶8

Kallakurichi Taluk and District.

¶9

.. Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1^st respondent to reinstate the petitioner in the post of night watchman by considering the petitioner's representation dated 14.10.2019.

¶11

For Petitioner : M/s.C.Meena

¶12

For Respondents : Mr.L.P. Shanmuga Sundaram

¶13

Spl.GP (Co.op)

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

Writ Petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1^st respondent to reinstate the petitioner in the post of night watchman by considering the petitioner's representation dated 14.10.2019.

¶16

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader (Co.Op) appearing for the respondents.

¶17

The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as night watchman with the respondents in the year 2006 for a remuneration of Rs.1200/- per month. The petitioner was regular in service and was working for the past 13 years without any blemish and all of a sudden he was removed from service on 01.10.2019 by the 1^st respondent without any notice or reason. The petitioner made representation on 14.10.2014, the 2^nd

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

respondent refused to receive the representation and the same was returned to him on 18.10.2019. Hence, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

¶21

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representations and pass appropriate orders within the reasonable time.

¶22

Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court directs the petitioner to send representation to the respondents along with a copy of this order. The respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation after affording due opportunity to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the representation from the petitioner.

¶23

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

¶24

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
ak
To
1. The President
Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society,
Kallakurichi Taluk and District.
2. The Secretary,
Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society,
Kallakurichi Taluk and District.
+1 cc to M/s.L.P.Shanmugasundaram Advocate sr91666
+1 cc to M/s.C.Meena Advocate sr90941
W.P.No.30561 of 2019
rp(co)
aa19/11/2019

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

E.Murugan v. The President

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

E.Murugan v. The President

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Subash Chand Bafna Vs the Inspector General of

M.Jagadeesan Vs The Union of iNdia

R.Raghavan, Vs the Assistance Executive

J.Jambu Vs G.Vediyappan

P.Chinnamuthu, Vs the Tahsildar

C.Venkatachalam, Vs the Tahsildar