This writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari and waiver of interest was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear or submit any representation on the date of hearing.
Writ petitions and connected miscellaneous petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED: 19.07.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
W.P.No.29842 of 2008 & M.P.No.1 of 2008
K.Parthiban ...Petitioner
Vs
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Tiruchirappalli.
...Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent in C.No.932(33)/2003-04/CCIT/TRY dated 25.09.2008 and quash the same and further direct the respondent to grant waiver of interest under Sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 1997-98, 98-99, 99-00 and 2000-01.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondents: Mr.Prabhu Mukund Arunkumar, JSC
ORDER
When the matter was listed on 12.07.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter came to be listed today, under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, these Writ Petitions are dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is dismissed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(Co)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kal To
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Tiruchirappalli.
W.P.No.29842 of 2008 & M.P.No.1 of 2008
ev (CO) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ A.SK(22/08/2019)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K.Parthiban
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Tiruchirappalli
M.S. Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
