K.George v. Railway Board
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed Writ Petition No. 29482 of 2008 as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel with an endorsement filed on July 29, 2019. No costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No costs were awarded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 29.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.29482 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008
K.George,
Managing Director,
Kottukulam Engineers Private Ltd.
New No.398 (Old No.766) Poonamallee
High Road, Kilpauk,
Chennai 600 010. ...Petitioner
Vs
1.Railway Road,
Ministry of Railways,
Rail Bhavan,
New Delhi.
2.The Principal Chief Engineer,
Southern Railway,
Headquarters Office, Works Branch,
Chennai 600 003.
3.Southern Railway,
Represented by its General Manager,
Park Town, Chennai 600 003. ..Respondents
Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records culminating in the impugned order issued by the second respondent in Letter No.W/456/4/CS/BQI/156/05, dated 11.08.2008 and consequential letter No.S.26/S/[PER]/ST/NEFT 2008 C00645, dated 19.08.2008 effecting deduction of the liquidated amount of Rs.65,24,187/and quash and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to apply the new price variation formula for the supply of the balance quantity, if any, under agreement dated 03.04.2006 and the additional quantity of 30% concrete sleepers by the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. George
- respondent
Ministry of Railways
- respondent
The Principal Chief Engineer, Southern Railway
- respondent
Southern Railway
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court