Writ petitioner sought possession of property. While listed for dismissal, the petitioner failed to appear on hearing dates (04.06.2019 and 06.06.2019). The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution without adjudication on merits.
Writ Petition No.29180 of 2003 dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Writ Petition No.29180 of 2003
Agnes Eapen
W/o.Eapen ...Petitioner
Vs
1.The Special Commissioner and
Secretary to Government,
Revenue Department,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Fort St.George,
Madras - 9.
2.The Commissioner for Land Reforms,
Chepauk, Madras - 5.
3.The Special Deputy Collector (ULT),
Saidapet, Madras - 15.
4.The Special Officer,
The High Court Staff and City
Judicial Officer Cooperative
Housing (House) Building Society
Ltd., High Court Buildings,
Madras - 104.
5.George Idicula
6.George Verghese
7.Susan Verghese
(R5 to R7 represented by Power of
Attorney V.Srikala)
8.Sara Mathew
9.The Assistant Commissioner, Urban Land Tax, Alandur, Madras - 16.
10.Leela George ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records of G.O.Ms.No.676, dated 01.11.1994, Revenue Department, on the file of first respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to put the petitioner in possession and enjoyment of the property mentioned in the aforesaid G.O. as the owner thereof.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam No appearance For Respondents: Mr.V.Shanmuga Sundar Special Government Pleader [R1 to R3 & R9] Dismissed vide order dated 26.08.2011 [R5 to R8 & R10] O R D E R [Order was delivered by R.SUBBIAH,J]
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 04.06.2019, there was no representation for petitioner and hence, Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on 06.06.2019. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Sd/Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gm To 1.The Special Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Madras - 9.
2.The Commissioner for Land Reforms,
Chepauk, Madras - 5.
3.The Special Deputy Collector (ULT),
Saidapet, Madras - 15.
4.The Assistant Commissioner,
Urban Land Tax, Alandur,
Madras – 16.
5.The Special Officer,
The High Court Staff and City
Judicial Officer Cooperative
Housing (House) Building Society
Ltd., High Court Buildings,
Madras - 104.
Writ Petition No.29180 of 2003
RR(CO)
CSL/25.06.2019
Agnes Eapen
The Special Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Government of Tamil Nadu
The Commissioner for Land Reforms
The Special Deputy Collector (ULT)
The Special Officer, The High Court Staff and City Judicial Officer Cooperative Housing (House) Building Society Ltd.
Leela George
R.SUBBIAH
C.SARAVANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
