A.Periyasami v. the Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ forbearing respondents from seizing agricultural machinery. Court dismissed petition as infructuous because the underlying conditional order for deposit of Rs.75,000 remained uncomplied with.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.29105 of 2007
and
M.P.No.1 of 2007
A.Periyasami ..Petitioner
vs
1.The Manager,
State Bank of India,
(H.O.) Vellore.
2.The Manager,
Odiyathur Village,
State Bank of India,
Pallikonda (Via),
Vellore District.
3.Harvel Tractor,
151, Katpadi Road,
Virudhampattu Village,
Katpadi Taluk,
Vellore District. .. Respondents
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from forcibly seizing the Tractor TN.23 AY7229, TN.23 7230 Trailer, Puddler, Tiller and Leveler without following due process of law.
For Petitioner : Ms.R.T.Sundari For Respondents : Mr.P.Elayaraj Kumar for M/s.Ramalingam & Associates for R1 and R2 No appearance for R3
2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Periyasami
- respondent
The Manager, State Bank of India, (H.O.) Vellore
- respondent
The Manager, Odiyathur Village, State Bank of India, Pallikonda (Via), Vellore District
- respondent
Harvel Tractor
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court