The single judge, upon counsel's submission, directed that the Second Respondent (Director of School Education) should be read as the First Respondent in an order dated 01.12.2019 regarding a petitioner's claim. A corrected copy of the order was ordered to be issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
W.P.No.2829 of 2019
R.MAHADEVAN, J.
The matter is listed today under the caption, ''for being mentioned''.
the petitioner, in the order dated 01.02.2019 passed in W.P.No.2829/2019, in 4th line of paragraph 4, the second respondent shall be read as first respondent.
Note:
Registry to issue corrected copy of the order to the parties. tsi
2
R.MAHADEVAN, J. tsi
W.P.No.2829 of 2019
04.12.2019
Petitioner
First Respondent (Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Government of Tamil Nadu)
Second Respondent (Director of School Education)
R.MAHADHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
