Dismissed
K.Kasinathan @ Vivekanandan v. the Secretary to Govt.
Madras HCWP/27986/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 23.07.2019 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.27986 of 2007 and MP.No.2 of 2007
K.Kasinathan @ Vivekanandan ..Petitioner
Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertain to G.O.Ms.172/2004, dated 12.02.2004 issued by the first respondent herein and the same may be quashed.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.I.Sathish, AGP
ORDER
When the matter came up for hearing on 19.07.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the petition is posted today under the caption "for dismissal". Even today there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy// https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Sub Assistant Registrar
pvs
To 1. The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai. 2. The Competent Authority and District Revenue Officer, Chennai 1. 3. The Additional Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai 5.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K. Kasinathan @ Vivekanandan
Secretary to Government, Home Department
Competent Authority and District Revenue Officer
Additional Commissioner of Land Administration
Inspector General of Police, Economic Offence Wing-II
K. Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court