Dismissed

K.Chandrasekaran v. Government of Tamilnadu

Madras HC15 Mar 2019WP/27700/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed in 2008 challenging a selection for an Assistant Planner post. The petition was struck out for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent on two consecutive listing dates in 2019 without representation.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; consequential miscellaneous petition also dismissed.

K.Chandrasekaran Vs Government of Tamilnadu — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 15.03.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA

¶5

W.P.No.27700 of 2008

¶6

K.Chandrasekaran .. Petitioner

¶7

-vs1. Government of Tamil Nadu rep.by the Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore, Chennai 600 008

¶8

Assistant Director Professional & Executive Employment Officer Jayaprakash Narayanan Building Chennai 600 004

¶9

S.Panneer Selvam 4. V.Sharmili 5. S.Shantha Sudha .. Respondents

¶10

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent in proceeding No.E-2/23097/2006 dated 28.11.2007 in so far as selection of respondents 3 to 5 and quash the same and consequently select and appoint the petitioner as Assistant Planner.

¶11

For Petitioner :: No appearance For Respondents :: Mr.K.Ravikumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 & 2 Mr.P.Ganesan for R3 Mr.A.Muthukumar for R5 No appearance for R4 ORDER

¶12

This writ petition was filed in the year 2008. When the matter was taken up on 08.03.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption “for

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

dismissal”. Today also, when the matter was called, none appears for the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is constrained to dismiss the writ petition for non prosecution. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, M.P.No.2 of 2008 is also dismissed.

¶15

Sd/-

¶16

Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶17

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ss
To
1. The Member Secretary
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road
Egmore, Chennai 600 008
2. The Assistant Director
Professional & Executive Employment Officer
Jayaprakash Narayanan Building
Santhome, Chennai 600 004
+1cc to Mr.A.Muthukumar , Advocate SR.No. 24586
W.P.No.27700 of 2008
A.SK(12/04/2019)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Chandrasekaran v. Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Chandrasekaran v. Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

H.Grace Annabai,W/O.W.D.Daniel Vs the Secretary to Government

V.Kuruvammal Vs the Special Commissioner and

M.Baskar Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Suresh G.V Vs P.Senthilvel

V.Selvaraj Vs Government of Tamil Nadu

G.Vijayalaxmi Vs the Secretary to Government