Petitioner withdrew petition on instructions; husband given liberty to file fresh petition. Writ petition dismissed as not pressed. Connected miscellaneous petitions also dismissed.
Liberty granted to petitioner's husband to file a fresh petition. Original writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.01.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P.No.27570 of 2018 and WMP.Nos.32111 and 32115 of 2018
Avaneeswari ...Petitioner
Vs
1.The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment,
No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam,
Chennai – 600 034.
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Mayiladuthurai,
Nagapattinam District.
3.The Assistant Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Kumbakonam,
Thanjavur District.
4.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Pasupatheeswarar Thirukovil, Panthanallur, Thanjavur District. ..Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned notice dated 05.07.2018 signed by the respondents 3 and 4 and quash the same and consequently direct them to unseal the lock done by them on 05.07.2018 in her residential house (800 sq.ft) at No.3/371 Kottai, Pandanallur & Post, Thiruvidaimaruthur Taluk, Tanjore District.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ravikumar
For Respondents : Mr.V.Karthic, SC for Mr.M.Maharaja, SGP (HR&CE)
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition and hence, this writ petition may be dismissed, with liberty to file a fresh petition by the husband of the petitioner. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the writ petition.
2.In view of the submission and the endorsement so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, liberty is granted and this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed.
rk
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1cc to the Spl.Government Pleader, S.R.No.7242
W.P.No.27570 of 2018
rv(CO) kak(27/02/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Avaneeswari
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment
The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment
The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment
The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Pasupatheeswarar Thirukovil
R. MAHADEVAN
P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
