Disposed

R.Raghu, v. The District Collector

Madras HC17 Sept 2019WP/27281/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, in this writ petition, directed the District Collector to dispose of a pending representation from 17.6.2019 within four weeks, ensuring parties were afforded a hearing opportunity, before disposing of the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Collector to dispose of the pending representation within four weeks after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

R.Raghu, Vs The District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 17.9.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶7

W.P.No.27281 of 2019
and
W.M.P.No.26703 of 2019
R.Raghu Petitioner
Versus
1. The District Collector,
Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District.
2. The Block Development Officer,
Gummidipoondi, Thiruvallur District.
3. M/s.Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited,
Having its Circle Office at A1 Tower,
8th Floor, 89-90, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai,
Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.
4. K.Selvam Respondents

¶8

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 17.6.2019 and to take action against Respondents 3 and 4 for unauthorisedly constructing and erecting of Mobile Tower on the House Site, namely, House Site of extent 2400 sq.ft. comprised in S.No.152/12, Athupakkam Village, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶9

For petitioner : Mr.P.Mohanran

¶10

For RR1 and 2 : Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy, Govt. Advocate

¶11

ORDER

¶12

(Order of the court was made by C.SARAVANAN, J.)

¶13

The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 17.6.2019 and to

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

take action against Respondents 3 and 4 for unauthorisedly constructing and erecting of Mobile Tower on the House Site, namely, House Site of extent 2400 sq.ft. comprised in S.No.152/12, Athupakkam Village, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶16

Heard Mr.P.Mohanraj, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy, learned Government Advocate appearing for Respondents 1 and 2.

¶17

Since the Petitioner's representation is pending before the first respondent from 17.6.2019, we direct the first Respondent to dispose of the same, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of four weeks from today. The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. The connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Copy of this order be sent to the Respondents.

¶18

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ssk.
To:
1. The District Collector,
Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District.
2. The Block Development Officer,
Gummidipoondi, Thiruvallur District.
3. M/s.Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited,
Having its Circle Office at A1 Tower,
8th Floor, 89-90, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai,
Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.
+1cc to Mr.P.Mohanraj, Advocate, S.R.No.79722
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 80173

¶19

W.P.No.27281 of 2019

¶20

VBA(CO) GN(30/09/2019)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Raghu, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Raghu, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manickchand Balecha Vs Indian Bank

The Commissioner of Vs M/S.S.S.M.Estates Ltd.

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S Teledate

S.Soundararajan Vs The District Collector

K.Rajendiran Vs The District Colelctor

K.Gobinath Vs The Commissioner of Municipal