Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition under Article 226 challenging bank's non-consideration of a representation. Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed petition with liberty to approach bank for one-time settlement.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to approach bank for one-time settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.09.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P.No.27059 of 2010
A.Manonmani .. Petitioner Vs. The Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Salem Branch, Narasu's Arcade, 53/24, 2nd Agraharam, Salem District. .. Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.02.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Sudhakaran For Respondent : No Appearance
O R D E R (By DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J.)
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Assistant Registrar (CS-III) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kkd
To
The Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Salem Branch, Narasu's Arcade, 53/24, 2nd Agraharam, Salem District.
+1cc to Mr.J.Sudhakaran, Advocate, S.R.No. 78668
W.P.No.27059 of 2019
RR(CO)
GN(14/10/2019)
A.Manonmani
The Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Salem Branch
VINEET KOTHARI
C.SARAVANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
