S.Sundaramurthy v. Corporation of Chennai, Rep
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.11.2019
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.2663 of 2004
and W.P.M.P.No.23967 of 2004
Mr.S.Sundaramurthy ...Petitioner
Versus 1. Corporation of Chennai, Rep.by its Commissioner, Rippon Buildings, Chennai – 600 003. 2. Corporation of Chennai Zonal Office-8, Rep.by Zonal Officer -8, 64, N.S.K.Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into his service with immediate effect, in accordance with the Decree and Judgment dated 25.9.2003, passed by the VIII City Civil Court, Chennai in O.S.No.3104 of 2003.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.V.C.Selvasekaran
When the matter was listed for hearing on 24.10.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was adjourned by one week. Subsequently, when the matter was listed for hearing on 31.10.2019 also there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence the Registry is directed to list the matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 01.11.2019.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
ms
To
1. The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Rippon Buildings,
Chennai – 600 003.
2. The Zonal Officer -8,
Corporation of Chennai
Zonal Office-8,
64, N.S.K.Salai, Kodambakkam,
Chennai – 600 024.
W.P.No.2663 of 2004
and
W.P.M.P.No.23967 of 2004
MP(CO)
SP(06/12/2019)
Mr. S. Sundaramurthy
Corporation of Chennai
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court