M.G.Kannan v. the Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by M.G. Kannan for non-prosecution, as the petitioner had no representation and appeared uninterested in continuing the matter regarding alleged unlawful seizure of vehicles.
What did the court decide?
None; the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 23..10..2019 CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Writ Petition No.22418 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007
M.G.Kannan
... Petitioner -Versus1. The Manager, State Bank of India, Head Office, Vellore. 2. The Manager, State of India, Odiyathur Branch, Pallikondai (via), Vellore Taluk & District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Veppakuppam Police Station, Vellore District.
... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from resorting to unlawful seizure of Tractor TN23 AB 4450 No.C1.71882/05 and Trailer TN 23 AB 4451/R1/No.C1.71883/05 by engaging the Collection Agents (probably Goondas) by the respondents 1 and 2 and to take away the tractor and trailer forcibly without due process of law. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent(s) : M/s.Ramalingam & Associates for RR1 and 2 Mr.I.Sathish, AGP for R3
ORDER
When this writ petition came up on 22.10.2019 for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, this court had directed the matter to be posted today under the
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.G. Kannan
- respondent
The Manager, State Bank of India, Head Office, Vellore
- respondent
The Manager, State of India, Odiyathur Branch, Pallikondai (via), Vellore Taluk & District
- respondent
The Inspector of Police, Veppakuppam Police Station, Vellore District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court