A single-paragraph order closing a writ petition seeking directions from the Madras High Court to permit the petitioner to attend a scheduled interview, recording the respondent's assurance that the case would be considered afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.02.2019 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No. 2172 of 2019
C.Thangamani .. Petitioner Vs.
The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Rep by its Chairman, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town,
Chennai 3. .. Respondent
PRAYER : This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to attend oral test that is being scheduled to be held on 25.01.2019.
Mr.V.T.Gopalan, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission made a submission that in the ensuing interview, the case of the petitioner would be considered afresh and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the interview and no inference will be drawn in respect of the allegations raised by both parties.
Kmm To
The Chairman,
The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town,Chennai 3. +1cc to Mr.M.Bakrutheen , Advocate SR.No. 18510
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ A.SK(01/04/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.Thangamani
The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
