Dismissed

K.S.A. Prabhu, v. The District Collector

Madras HC5 Sept 2019WP/21574/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard a writ petition filed by K.S.A. Prabhu seeking closure of an unlicensed bakery unit. The petitioner's counsel moved to withdraw the petition, and the Court allowed the withdrawal, resulting in a dismissal without costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; consequently, connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.

K.S.A. Prabhu, Vs The District Collector — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated: 05.09.2019

¶3

Coram::

¶4

The Honourable Dr.Justice G.Jayachandran

¶5

W.P.No.21574 of 2018 & W.M.P.No.25326 of 2018

¶6

K.S.A.Prabhu, S/o.Subbarayalu, M/s.S.P.Fuels, Erode-Karur Main Roadm Salaipudur, Chenna Samudram Village, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District. ... Petitioner /verus/

¶7

The District Collector, Erode District, Erode. 2. The Executive Officer, Chenna Samudram Town Panchayat, Erode-Karur Main Road, Salaipudur, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District.

¶8

R.Dinesh, S/o.M.Rajendran, M/s.154/1, Erode Karur Main Road, Chinnasamudram, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District. ... Respondents

¶9

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to permanently close the unlicensed operation of the 3^rd respondent Bakery Unit situated at Erode-Karur Main Road, Salaipudur, Chenna Samudram Village, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District, comprised in New Survey No.362/4 until and unless proper license is granted by the 2^nd respondent as under the provisions of the Section 159 and 160 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994 for ensuring precautionary measure to safeguard the interest of the petitioner's Fuel Retail outlet as

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

well as the General Public in the locality from any untoward incident as per Section 143 of Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994, based on the representation of the petitioner dated 27.07.2018 and pass orders.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Vairamoorthy
For R1 : Mr.N.Inbanathan,
Additional Government Pleader
For R2 : Mr.A.Ansar, Government Advocate
For R3 : Mr.S.Vijayakumar
O R D E R
The Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an
endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is
dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected
Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
bsm
To,
1. The District Collector,
Erode District, Erode.
2. The Executive Officer,
Chenna Samudram Town Panchayat,
Erode-Karur Main Road,
Salaipudur,
Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District.
+1cc to Mr.S.Senthil, Advocate Sr.77588
W.P. No. 21574 of 2018
vsnII[co]
srg 27/09/2019

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.S.A. Prabhu, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.S.A. Prabhu, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharathi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Vs The Central Registrar

P.Neelaveni Vs The District Collector

K.Nalene Prasad Vs Union of India

G.Suresh Vs The Assistant Executive Engineer

Moorthy, Vs The Collector

Manikandan Vs The Registrar