Dismissed

Haja Noordeen Sahib @ v. The Adhoc Board of Administrators

Madras HC5 Aug 2019WP/2109/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Petition filed seeking writ of mandamus to permit petitioner and family/subordinates to perform holy rituals at Nagore Dargah for deceased trustee. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition after obtaining clarification from Supreme Court on connected issue.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition after Supreme Court clarification.

Haja Noordeen Sahib @ Vs The Adhoc Board of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.08.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH

¶5

and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶7

Writ Petition No.2109 of 2019 and W.M.P.Nos.3080 and 3349 of 2019

¶8

Haja Noordeen Sahib @ Alhaj Dr.S.Syed Kamil Sahib

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

¶11

1.The Adhoc Board of Administrators,

¶12

Nagore Dargah Interim Adhoc Administrators, Nagore Dargah, Nagore - 611 002. Nagapattinam District.

¶13

2.The Manager,

¶14

represented by Mr.Jahabar Hussain, Nagore Dargah, Nagore - 611 002. Nagapattinam District.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing first respondent herein to permit the petitioner to his family members and his subordinates to participate/perform the holy rituals which relate to the deceased eighth Trustee.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisthi For Respondents : Mr.V.Lakshmi Narayanan

¶18

ORDER

¶19

[Order was made by R.SUBBIAH, J]

¶20

Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶21

Learned counsel for proposed party in W.M.P.No.3349 of 2019 in W.P.No.2109 of 2019 objects to grant liberty stating that connected issue is pending before the Honourable Supreme

¶22

Court and a petition seeking clarification in connection therewith has also been filed and hence, pending decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in the clarification petition, petitioner would not be entitled to file a fresh Writ Petition.

¶23

On the other hand, learned counsel for petitioner submits that decision on the clarification petition is nothing to do with the present petitioner.

¶24

In the aforestated circumstances, this Court dismisses the Writ Petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition after obtaining necessary clarification from the Honourable Supreme Court. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

//True Copy//

The Adhoc Board of Administrators, Nagore Dargah Interim Adhoc Administrators, Nagore Dargah, Nagore - 611 002. Nagapattinam District.

¶30

+1 cc to M/s.V.Raghavachari,Advocate Sr.No. 66661

¶31

+1 cc to Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran, Advocate Sr.No.66553 +1 cc to Mr.S.Sounthar, Advocate Sr.No.66958

¶32

AKM/16.09.19/2P-5C /

¶33

Writ Petition No.2109 of 2019

Haja Noordeen Sahib @ v. The Adhoc Board of Administrators

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Haja Noordeen Sahib @ v. The Adhoc Board of Administrators

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Sugumar, Vs The Tamilnadu State Level

K.Dalpat Singh Vs Intellectual Property Appellate Board

S.Ezhil Vs The Thasildar

M.Rajam Vs The District Collector

G.Balaji Vs The District Collector

Arul Pandian @ Arun Pandian Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer