Shanmugham v. The Director of Fisheries
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ relief for extension of payment time for fisheries dues. Permission was granted to withdraw the writ petition, leading to its dismissal.
Petitioner sought writ relief for extension of payment time for fisheries dues. Permission was granted to withdraw the writ petition, leading to its dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.12.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Writ Petition No.21015 of 2019 and W.M.P.Nos. 20199 & 20197 of 2019
S.Shanmugham ...Petitioner
Vs
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.2999/E/2017 dated 17.06.2019 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to extend the time for further period of 6 months for payment of the amount for Fasli 1429, 1430 in respect of Siruvathur Lake, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.
For Respondents : Mr.R.Govindasamy, Special Government Pleader.
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission and made the endorsement to withdraw the writ petition.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII)
// True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Pns
To
Writ Petition No.21015 of 2019 and W.M.P.Nos. 20197 & 20199 of 2019
RJI(CO) CSR:22/01/2020
S.Shanmugham
The Director of Fisheries, Fisheries Department, Chennai
The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Cuddalore
The Joint Director of Fisheries (Division) Cuddalore
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court