Petitioner sought certiorari against a Board order. Counsel submitted the petition was infructuous. Court dismissed the writ as infructuous and closed connected miscellaneous petition.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED: 07.02.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
WP.No.20011 of 2002 and
WP.MP.No.27620 of 2002
S.Mukundan Thampi ...Petitioner
Vs
Managing Director, TWAD Board, 31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai - 5. ...Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, or order or direction more in the nature of a Writ of certiorari, against the respondent to call for records and strike down BP.Ms.No.54 dated 07.02.2002 issued by the respondent.
For Petitioner : Ms.M.Santhanamari for Mr.E.J.Ayyappan For Respondent : Mrs.S.Thamizharasi,SC
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in the Writ Petition has become infructuous and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the present Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
hvk
To Managing Director, TWAD Board, 31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai – 5.
+1cc to Mrs.S.Thamizharasi , Advocate SR.No. 10630
WP.No.20011 of 2002
and
WP.MP.No.27620 of 2002
A.SK(05/03/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Mukundan Thampi
Managing Director, TWAD Board
M.S. Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
