In three writ petitions challenging non-employment proceedings, the High Court of Madras disposed of the matters as infructuous since the parties had reached a settlement, rendering further adjudication unnecessary.
The writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous based on the settlement between parties; no further adjudication needed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :30.10.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.Nos.19922, 19923 & 19924 of 2003
M/s. Santhi Casting Works,
Post Box No.5506,
Kumarapuram,
Narasima Naicken Palayam Post,
Coimbatore – 641031. ...Petitioner in all WPs
..Vs..
1.Assistant Commissioner,
Conciliation III
Dr.Balasundaram Road,
Coimbatore – 641018.
2.State of Tamil Nadu
represented by the Commissioner & Secretary
Labour & Employment Department,
Fort St.George,
Chennai – 600009.
...Respondents in all WPs
3. S.K.Balasundaram
...3 rd Respondent in WP.No.19924/2003
(R3 impleaded as per order of Court
dated 03.12.2003 in WPMP.No.39931/2003)
Common Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records from the file of the first respondent herein in his proceedings bearing No.768/2002, No.772/2002 and No.767/2002 respectively dated 13.03.2003 and to quash the same and for a Mandamus forbearing the second respondent Government from referring the issue of alleged non employment for adjudication.
For Petitioner : Mr.H.Balaji
(in all WPs)
For Respondents : Mr.D.Suriyanarayanan (R1 & R2) Additional Government Pleader (in all WPs)
COMMON ORDER
The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as the respondent made a submission that the issues between the parties were already settled.
2.In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, no further adjudication needs to be entertained in respect of the grounds raised in the present writ petition and accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.90734
W.P.Nos.19922, 19923 & 19924 of 2003]
rr[co] srg 12/12/2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking quashing of non-employment proceedings should be allowed when parties have settled the dispute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Santhi Casting Works
Assistant Commissioner, Conciliation III
State of Tamil Nadu
S.K. Balasundaram
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
