Disposed

Texmo Precision Castings, v. the Check Post Officer

Madras HC3 Jul 2019WP/18182/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging a compounding notice under Section 72 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act. The petitioner requested liberty to file a revision. The High Court granted liberty to approach the Revisional Authority and disposed of the writ petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file a revision under Section 54 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act within 30 days. Writ petition disposed of. No costs.

Texmo Precision Castings, Vs the Check Post Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 03.07.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

¶5

W.P.No.18182 of 2011

¶6

Texco Precision Castings, Rep. by its Managing Partner Damayanthi Ramachandran, Mettupalayam Road,

¶7

G.N.Mills P.O, Coimbatore - 29. ...Petitioner

¶8

¶9

The Check Post Officer, (Commercial Taxes) Meenakshipuram, Coimbatore - 29.

¶10

The Assistant Commissioner, Thudiyalur Circle, Coimbatore.

¶11

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department,

¶12

Fort St.George, Chennai - 600009 ...Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the files of the first respondent herein in his OR No.46/2011-12 dated 30.06.2011, quash the same and direct the first respondent herein to refund the amount of Rs.4,54,605/- with interest.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Narayanan

¶15

for Mr.N.Inbarajan For Respondents: Mrs.Dhanamadri, GA ORDER

¶16

The present writ petition has been filed against the compounding notice issued by the 1st respondent for contravention of Section 72 of Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act. Pursuant to the compounding notice, the petitioner has also paid the compounding fee on the same day.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Though the petitioner has raised several grounds challenging the notice, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he would be satisfied, if liberty is granted to him to file a revision under Section 54 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act.

¶19

In view of the submissions made, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the concerned Revisional Authority under the TNVAT Act, as against the impugned notice in the present writ petition. Such an exercise shall be made within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶20

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. hvk Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Check Post Officer, (Commercial Taxes) Meenakshipuram, Coimbatore - 29. 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Thudiyalur Circle, Coimbatore. 3. The Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600009. +1cc to Mr.N.Inbarajan, Advocate, SR.No.55680 +1cc to the Spl.Govt.Pleader,(Taxes) Vide Sr.No.56133 W.P.No.18182 of 2011 Kak(10/09/2019)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Texmo Precision Castings, v. the Check Post Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Texmo Precision Castings, v. the Check Post Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Ergomaxx India Pvt.Ltd., Vs the Assistant Commissioner

M/S.Narangs International Vs Additional Secretary/

M/S.Kumaran Traders Vs the Commercial Tax Officer

M/S.Wabco India Limited Vs Anjur Panchayat Union

M/S. J.A. & Co., Vs the Deputy Commissioner (Ct)

M/S.Glodium Trades (Pvt). Ltd. Vs the Commissioner of Customs