M.Mythili v. K.Ganesan
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent and failed to appear for hearing on the appointed date before the High Court of Judicature at Madras.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution connected Miscellaneous Petition closed
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P. 18169 of 2009 and M.P. 2 of 2009
M.Mythili .. Petitioner
Vs
1. K.Ganesan,
S/o. Kalianna Gounder,
No.1, Nawab Thottam,
Woraiyur,
Trichirappalli-3.
2. The Regional Transport Authority,
Tiruchirappalli.
3. The State Transport Appellate
Tribunal,
City Civil Court Building,
Chennai-600 104. .. Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari,
calling for the records of the 3 rd respondent relating to
R.P.No.14/2008 dated 29.01.2009 and quash that portion of the
order of the 3 rd respondent directing the 2 nd respondent to make a
joint inspection along with the application for renewal, the 1 st
respondent and the objectors.
For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R2 & R3 O R D E R
When the above Writ Petition was posted for hearing on 15.07.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was posted today “for dismissal”. Even today, (17.07.2019) there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through the counsel on record.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Mythili
- respondent
K. Ganesan
- respondent
The Regional Transport Authority, Tiruchirappalli
- respondent
The State Transport Appellate Tribunal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court