Dismissed

B.Vasudevan v. The Tamil Nadu Housing Board

Madras HC27 Jun 2019WP/17670/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed a public interest litigation petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner sought to cancel a land allotment made to a fourth respondent. Upon being informed of insufficient particulars, the petitioner requested to withdraw and re file with full evidence. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition with a liberty to

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to file a fresh writ petition containing full particulars supported by documents.

B.Vasudevan Vs The Tamil Nadu Housing Board — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27/06/2019

¶2

C O R A M

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶4

W.P.No.17670 of 2019

¶5

and W.M.P.Nos.17108 and 17111 of 2019

B. Vasudevan

...Petitioner

The Tamil Nadu Housing Board rep. By its Chairman and Managing Director 493 Anna Salai, Nandanam Chennai 600 035.

¶10

The Assistant Engineer, TNEB No.1 Link Road, Anna Salai Nandanam, Chennai 35.

¶11

The Executive Officer Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board No.32 South West Boag Road T. Nagar Chennai 17.

¶12

J. Mangai @ Mankaiyarkarasi

¶13

Sunil ...Respondents

¶14

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to cancel the original allotment of Plot No.25 A Canal Bank Road, CIT Nagar, Chennai 35, in favour of the fourth respondent Mankaiyarkarasi or anybody claiming through or under her.

¶15

For Petitioner ... Mr.D. Nellaiappan For Respondents ... Mr.R. Bharath Kumar for R.1

¶16

Mr.M.Jothikumar for R.3

¶17

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

(Order of this Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.)

¶21

Instant public interest litigation has been filed, for a writ of mandamus, directing the first respondent, to cancel the original allotment of Plot No.25 A Canal Bank Road, CIT Nagar, Chennai 35, in favour of J. Mangai @ Mankaiyarkarasi, fourth respondent or anybody claiming through or under her.

¶22

When this Court, drew the attention of the learned counsel for the petitioner to the insufficiency of the particulars furnished in the averments of the supporting affidavit and to the documents enclosed in the typed set of papers, which do not satisfy the requirements of Public interest litigation, Mr.D. Nellaiappan, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court, to withdraw the instant writ petition, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, with full particulars, supported by documents.

¶23

Placing on record the above submission, instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for is granted. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶26

//True Copy//

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

To:

¶29

1.The Chairman and Managing Director

¶30

Tamil Nadu Housing Board 493 Anna Salai, Nandanam

¶31

Chennai 600 035.

¶32

2.The Assistant Engineer, TNEB No.1 Link Road, Anna Salai Nandanam, Chennai 35.

¶33

3.The Executive Officer

¶34

Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply

¶35

and Sewerage Board No.32 South West Boag Road

¶36

T. Nagar, Chennai 17.

¶37

+1cc to Mr.R.Bharathkumar, Advocate, S.R.No.54612

¶38

W.P.No.17670 of 2019

¶39

SVI(CO) RRS(01/08/2019)

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Vasudevan v. The Tamil Nadu Housing Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Vasudevan v. The Tamil Nadu Housing Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Akilan, Vs The District Collector

C.Chenniyappan Vs The District Collector

M.Subramanian Vs The Divisional Engineer

The Government of T.N. Vs L.Kannan

K.Soundararajan Vs The District Collector

S.B.Gandhi, Social Worker Vs The Superintendent of Police