M.Senthilkumar v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the Registry to incorporate the omitted names of respondents 7 to 10 in the cause-title of an earlier order and issue a fresh copy.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Registry to incorporate the names of respondents 7 to 10 in the cause-title and issue a fresh order copy.
What the court decided
W.P.No.17503 of 2013
V.BHARATHIDASAN.J.,
[This matter has been heard through video conference]
This matter is listed today under the caption, “For Being Mentioned”.
- Earlier this court by order dated 27.11.2019 allowed the writ petition.
There are totally ten respondents in the writ petition. However, in the order dated
27.11.2019, only six respondents have been shown in the cause-title. The names
of the respondents 7 to 10 were omitted to be typed in the cause title. Hence, the
matter is listed today under the caption 'For Being Mentioned'.
- Considering the above said fact, Registry is directed to incorporate the
names of respondents 7 to 10 in the cause -title of the order dated 27.11.2019 and issue fresh order copy.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the registry must incorporate the omitted names of respondents 7 to 10 in the cause-title and issue a fresh copy of the order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. BHARATHIDASAN
- respondent
Respondents 7 to 10
Coram
V. BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court