Allowed

R.Ponnusamy, v. The District Revenue Officer

Madras HC27 Jun 2019WP/17372/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the Writ Petition seeking release of an Earth Moving Equipment (JCB Lift All) seized by police. The Court ordered the release of the vehicle within 7 days subject to the deposit of Rs.10,000, execution of a personal bond, an undertaking against future illegal activities, and participation in the enquiry.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondents to release the vehicle to the petitioner within 7 days of compliance with specific conditions including deposit of Rs.10,000 and execution of a personal bond.

R.Ponnusamy, Vs The District Revenue Officer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 27.06.2019

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶7

Writ Petition No.17372 of 2019
R.Ponnusamy
S/o.Ramasamy ...Petitioner
Vs
1.The District Revenue Officer,
Virudhachalam,
Cuddalore District.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Ramanatham Police Station,
Cuddalore District. ... Respondents

¶8

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents to release the petitioner's vehicle viz., Earth Moving Equipment (MMV) JCB Lift All 1253 Crane bearing Registration No.TN-77-A-3547, seized by respondents on 29.05.2019, by considering petitioner's representation dated 13.06.2019.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan For Respondents : Mr.V.Shanmuga Sundar Special Government Pleader

¶10

¶11

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶12

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

[Order was made by R.SUBBIAH, J ]

¶15

Petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents to release the petitioner's vehicle viz., Earth Moving Equipment (MMV) JCB Lift All 1253 Crane bearing Registration No.TN-77-A-3547, seized by respondents on 29.05.2019, by

¶16

considering petitioner's representation dated 13.06.2019.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Special Government Pleader for respondents.

¶18

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that respondents have seized the vehicle in question on 29.05.2019 on the ground of illegal carrying of Stones and till date, no order for release of the said vehicle had

¶19

been passed by respondents. Hence, he has come forward with the present Writ Petition.

¶20

On the other hand, it is submitted by learned Special Government

¶21

Pleader for respondents that the vehicle in question was used for illegal transportation of mines and minerals like Stones and hence, the vehicle was seized. He would further submit that petitioner has no previous case.

¶22

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶23

¶24

In any event, as the vehicle is under the custody of the

¶25

respondents from the date of seizure and considering the fact that if the same is allowed to be kept idle by exposing the same to rain and shine, it would certainly diminish their value, this Court is of the view that the

¶26

vehicle in question may be released by imposing conditions on the petitioner.

¶27

Accordingly, the respondents are directed to release the vehicle in

¶28

question to the petitioner within a period of 7 days from the date of compliance of the below mentioned condition Nos.(i) to (iii):

¶29

(i) Petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only)

¶30

before the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned as non-refundable deposit. After receipt of the above said amount, the same will have to be deposited by the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned, to the credit of the District Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust as non-refundable deposit.

¶31

(ii) Petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-

¶32

(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned jurisdictional Judicial Magistrate.

¶33

(iii)Petitioner shall give an undertaking before the respondents/authority concerned stating that he will not use the vehicle in question for any illegal activities in future and shall produce the same as and when

¶34

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶35

¶36

R.SUBBIAH, J AND C.SARAVANAN, J

¶37

¶38

required by the respondents and also the trial Court, failing which the

¶39

respondents/trial Court is/are at liberty to confiscate the vehicle.

¶40

(iv)Petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle in question till the disposal of

¶41

the proceedings before the authority concerned.

¶42

(v) Petitioner is also directed to participate in the enquiry to be conducted

¶43

by the respondents.

¶44

With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is

¶45

disposed of. No costs.

¶46

[R.P.S., J] [C.S.N., J]
27.06.2019

¶47

Note to office: Issue order copy by 01.07.2019

¶48

Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order Index : Yes/ No, Internet : Yes gm

¶49

¶50

1.The District Revenue Officer, Virudhachalam, Cuddalore District.

¶51

2.The Inspector of Police, Ramanatham Police Station, Cuddalore District.

¶52

Writ Petition No.17372 of 2019

¶53

http://www.judis.nic.in

R.Ponnusamy, v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Ponnusamy, v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Vajiram Vs The Chairman

Mr. Paramasivam Vs The Deputy Director

Chinnadurai Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

R.Ghunasekaran Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

S.Rasu Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Perumal Vs The District Collector