Dismissed

M/s.Tamizhkulam Pathipalayam v. The Inspector of Police (Crime)

Madras HC28 Jan 2019WP/1632/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ mandamus directing transfer of a closed enquiry to a higher authority. Court noted enquiry was closed in 2016 and dismissed writ, directing petitioner to approach Magistrate under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed; liberty granted to file private complaint or petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. No costs.

M/s.Tamizhkulam Pathipalayam Vs The Inspector of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 28.01.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶5

W.P.No.1632 of 2019 and W.M.P.No.1802 of 2019

¶6

M/s.Tamizhkulam Pathipalayam Represented by its Manager Muthamizhmani

¶7

No.119/A, Depotline Off. GST Road, Pallavaram, Chennai – 600 043. ... Petitioner

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

The Inspector of Police, (Crime) Pallavaram Police Station, Pallavaram, Chennai – 600 043.

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch C.I.D., No.220, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶11

The Chief Manager, Bank of India, Overseas Branch, Star House, 3^rd Floor, No.30, Old No.17, Erra Balu Street, Chennai – 600 001.

¶12

S.Kavitha

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2^nd Respondent to take over the investigation from the 1^st Respondent pursuant to the complaint made by the petitioner dated 24.09.2015 and complete the investigation within a reasonable time that may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, award costs.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muthuraman For R1 to R2 : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This writ petition has been filed seeking for transfer of the complaint to be enquired by the higher authority.

¶19

It is seen from the records that the complaint has been given by the petitioner in the year 2015 and the C.S.R. was also given to the petitioner. Since no action has been taken, the present writ petition has been filed seeking for transferring the enquiry to some other authority.

¶20

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, would submit that the complaint given by the petitioner has been enquired and the same was closed on 06.06.2016.

¶21

In view of the above development, this Court cannot grant the relief as sought for by the petitioner. The petitioner has to workout his remedy by filing a private complaint or by filing a petition under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C., before the concerned Magistrate and proceed further in accordance with law.

¶22

This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly by giving this liberty to the petitioner. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No Costs.

¶23

Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶24

//True Copy//

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

ssr/kal

¶27

¶28

The Inspector of Police, (Crime) Pallavaram Police Station, Pallavaram, Chennai – 600 043.

¶29

The Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch C.I.D., No.220, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

The Chief Manager, Bank of India, Overseas Branch, Star House, 3^rd Floor, No.30, Old No.17, Erra Balu Street, Chennai – 600 001. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶32

+2 ccs to Mr.S.Muthuraman, Advocate, S.R.No.6661

¶33

W.P.No.1632 of 2019
and W.M.P.No.1802 of 2019
RR(CO)
SSM(19/02/2019)

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Tamizhkulam Pathipalayam v. The Inspector of Police (Crime)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Tamizhkulam Pathipalayam v. The Inspector of Police (Crime)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Manimegalai Vs B.Guru @ Gurumoorthy

Mohammed Sultan Vs State by

V.Jayakodi Vs the Superintendent of Police

Sadasivan Pillai Vs Sheela

Kannan C. Vs Mohan

Alagarsamy Vs The state Inspector of Police