Dismissed

Grt Hotels and Resorts v. the State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC13 Jun 2019WP/15184/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge court dismissed a writ petition seeking exemption from entry tax on an imported Audi car and directive to register the vehicle without a No Objection Certificate, relying on established Supreme Court propositions and previous High Court judgments upholding levy.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner sought forbearance from entry tax demand and mandatory registration without NOC; petition dismissed.

Grt Hotels and Resorts Vs the State of Tamilnadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 13.06.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

¶5

W.P.No.15184 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011

¶6

GRT Hotels and Resorts Private Limited, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer T.Nataraajan, having registered office at No.136, (old No.104), Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600017. ...Petitioner Vs

¶7

The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by the Special Commissioner & Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600005.

¶8

The State of Tamilnadu Represented by its Secretary, Home (Transport) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600009.

¶9

Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, T.Nagar-South Assessment Circle, Chennai - 600017. 4. The Regional Transport Officer, K.K.Nagar West, Chennai - 600078.

¶10

The Motor Vehicles Inspector, K.K.Nagar West, Chennai - 600078. ...Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus,

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

forbearing the respondents and their subordinates from demanding or collecting entry tax on the vehicle imported by the petitioner being the Audi Q7 3.0 TDI Quattro Automatic car, bearing Chasis Number WAUZDB4L1BD033335 - Engine No.CJG 015328 and consequently direct the 4th and 5th respondents to register under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 the imported car being Audi Q7 3.0 TDI Quattro Automatic car, bearing Chasis Number WAUZDB4L1BD033335 - Engine No.CJG 015328, without insisting on a 'No Objection Certificate' from the respondent department for payment of Entry Tax.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.V.G.Suresh Kumar

¶15

For Respondents: Mr.Mohammed Shaffiq, Spl. GP for R1 & R3

¶16

The proposition of entry tax leviable on vehicles imported from abroad was subject to challenge in various writ petitions and has ultimately been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Following the proposition, a Division Bench of this Court in a batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.32710 of 2005, etc., dated 29.01.2019, had also dismissed the Writ petitions holding that the importers are liable to pay entry tax on the vehicles imported from abroad and brought into the State of Tamil Nadu for use or for sale.

¶17

In view of the same, the prayer sought for in the present writ petition cannot be considered. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII)

//True copy//

hvk

The Special Commissioner & Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600005.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

The Secretary,
Home (Transport) Department,
Fort St.George,
Chennai - 600009.
3. Assistant Commissioner of
Commercial Taxes,
T.Nagar-South Assessment Circle,
Chennai - 600017.
4. The Regional Transport Officer,
K.K.Nagar West,
Chennai - 600078.
5. The Motor Vehicles Inspector,
K.K.Nagar West,
Chennai – 600078.
+1cc to Mr.V.G.Suresh Kumar, Advocate SR.No.48897
+1cc to Government Pleader, SR.No.49123
+1cc to Special Government Pleader (Tax) SR.No.49032
W.P.No.15184 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
PP(CO)
GMY(05/07/2019)

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Grt Hotels and Resorts v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Grt Hotels and Resorts v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Ocean Interiors Ltd., Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Mr.N.Ravichandran Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Mr.P.Prakash Kumar, Vs the District Manager

Nelcast Limited Vs the State of Tamilnadu

K.K.Subramaniam, Vs the Commissioner

Miss N.Mrinalini Vs the State of Tamilnadu