Dismissed
Ms. Shahzadibi v. the State
Madras HCWP/15138/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition seeking quashing of an order regarding electricity charges was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on both listing dates.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition stands dismissed for Nonprosecution. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :02.07.2019 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.15138 of 2009
¶2
Mrs. Shahzadi Bi
¶3
..Petitioner
¶4
vs
¶5
- The State of Tamilnadu represented by its Secretary to Government, Energy Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600009.
¶6
- The Tamilnadu Electricity Board, represented by its Superintending Engineer, Chennai E.D.Circle/Central, Chennai-600034.
¶7
- The Tamilnadu Electricity Board, represented by its Executive Engineer, Anna Salai, Chennai-600002.
¶8
- The Tamilnadu Electricity Board, represented by its Assistant Enginner/ Chepauk, Chennai-600005.
¶9
- The Tamilnadu Electricity Board, represented by its Assistant Accounts Officer, Chintadripet Revenue Branch, Chennai- 600002.
¶10
- The Tamilnadu Electricity Board, represented by its Chief Vigilance Officer, Anna Salai, Chennai-600002.
¶11
- The Tamilnadu Electricity Board, represented by its Public Relation Officer, Anna Salai, Chennai-600002.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mrs. Shahzadi Bi
- respondent
The State of Tamilnadu represented by its Secretary to Government
- respondent
The Tamilnadu Electricity Board
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court