R.Subramanian v. the State of Tamilnadu
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS DATED:…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED: 16.07.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
W.P.No.15072 of 2009
and
M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2009
R.Subramanian ...Petitioner
Vs
1.The State of Tamilnadu rep. by its
Secretary, Home, Prohibition and
Excise Department, Fort St.George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.The State Transport Authority,
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
3.The Government of Karnataka rep. by
its Principal Secretary, Transport
Dept., Vidhan Sowdha,
Bangalore – 560 001, Karnataka State.
4.The State Transport Authority,
State of Karnataka, M.S.Building,
Dr.Ambedkar Veethi, Bangalore – 560 001.
...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent relating to Government order made in G.O.Ms.No.16, Home, Prohibition and Excise/Transport III Department dated 07.01.2008 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to include the petitioner's varied route in respect of vehicle No.TN24/Y-0399 since replaced by TN-24/U-3637 so as to ply Bangalore to Denkanikottah-two singles, Bangalore to Ayyur – 2 Singles, Denkanikottah to Ayyur – 2 singles and Bangalore to Hosur – 2 singles in the interstate agreement agreement between Tamilnadu and Karnataka.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Subramanian
- respondent
The State of Tamilnadu rep. by its Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department
- respondent
The State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai
- respondent
The Government of Karnataka rep. by its Principal Secretary, Transport Dept.
- respondent
The State Transport Authority, State of Karnataka, M.S.Building, Bangalore
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court