The Madras High Court recorded the compliance report regarding legal actions taken against a lessee for illegal quarrying. The District Collector imposed fines and deposits. The court accepted the report and closed the writ petition.
The compliance report was accepted, the writ petition was disposed of, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP.No.14250 of 2019
S.MANIKUMAR, J. AND SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.
(Order of this Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.)
While disposing of the W.P.No.14250 of 2019 on 25.06.2019 at paragraph
Nos. 8 & 9, we ordered as hereunder.
8. Action has been taken pursuant to the directions issued. Fourth respondent has to submit his explanation and final orders have to be passed by the District Collector, Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai. Learned Additional Government Pleader seeks three weeks time, from the date of receipt of the explanation, for passing final orders, in the enquiry initiated. Submission of learned Additional Government Pleader is placed on record.
9. The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai District, is directed to
pass orders, in accordance with the Mines and Minerals Rules, 1962 and government orders passed from time to time, regarding illegal quarrying of mines, in Proceedings No.379/kanimam/2019, within a period of three weeks, from the date of receipt of explanation, but not later than 6th August 2019.
2
compliance, thus it is listed today. Based on the compliance report filed by the District Collector, Thiruvannamalai, Mr.E.Manoharan, learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that action as hereunder has been taken. Report of the District Collector, Thiruvannamalai/first respondent reads thus:-
COMPLIANCE REPORT FILED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUVANNAMALAI
1. I, K.S.Kandasamy, son of K.Subramani, Hindu, aged about 51 years, working as District Collector, residing at Collector's Bungalow, Vengikkal, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District do hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely state as follows:
2. I respectfully submit that, in obedience to the interim order of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras, dated 07.06.2019, in W.P.No.14250 of 2019 filed by one Thiru.Parthiban S/o.Perumal, a committee constituted vide letter Rc.No.379/Kanimam/2019 to inspect the subject alleged quarrying in SF.No.25/2 Elachery village, Cheyyar Taluk. As such, the committee comprising Revenue Divisional Office, Cheyyar, Assistant Director (Survey and Land records) and Assistant Director of Geology and Mining have inspected the alleged illegal quarrying area of SF.No.25/2 and submitted their report.
3. From the report, it is ascertained that, the 4th respondent i.e., the lessee of stone quarry in SF.No.65/6 has violated the lease granting order conditions abutting lease expired patta stone quarry SF.No.25/2 belongs to him and unlawfully encroached on it and quarried and transported 7632 cu.m of Rough stone illegally by misusing the current lease permit.
3
4. It is submitted that, as of the 4th respondent has committed the offence by contravening to the sub-section (1) and (1A) of Section 4 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957. In this regard, a show-cause notice was issued to the 4th respondent vide Rc.No.379/Kanimam/2019 dated 20.06.2019, wherein directed to showcause, why the lease granted in SF.No.65/6 for quarrying Rough Stone vide District Collector's proceedings Rc.No.78/Kanimam/2014 dated 20.07.2014 should not be cancelled? for the violation of lease granting order condition by means of non providing of safety distance and also explain why action should not be taken against you under section 21(5) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 for the offence made in contravene the sub-section (1) and (1A) of section 4 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957, for indulging of illicit quarrying carried out in the lease expired quarry in SF.No.25/2?
5. Accordingly, a status report stating the above facts has been filed
before the Hon'ble Court, as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 07.06.2019.
6. It is submitted that, in this regard, the above case has came up for
hearing on 25.06.2019. Their Lordships have observed and directed as follows:
...7. From the status report, it could be seen that the fourth respondent has indulged in illegal quarrying, in S.No.25/2 and transported 7632 cubic meter of rough stone, which according to the learned Additional Government Pleader would be approximately Rs.40 lakhs.
4
8. Action has been taken pursuant to the directions issue. Fourth respondent has to submit his explanation and final orders have to be passed by the District Collector, Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai. Learned Additional Government Pleader seeks three weeks time, from the date of receipt of the explanation, for passing final
orders, in the enquiry initiated. Submission of learned Additional Government Pleader is placed on record.
9. The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai District, is directed to pass orders, in accordance with the mines and mineral rules, 1962 and government orders passed from time to time, regarding illegal quarrying of mines, in proceedings No.379/Kanimam/2019, within a period of three weeks, from the date of receipt of explanation, but not later than 6th August 2019.
10. With the above direction, writ petition is disposed of No costs. Consequently, the miscellaneous petition is closed.
11. Post on 08/08/2019, for compliance.
7. It is submitted that, in accordance with the compliance of the
above Hon'ble Court order, the following are submitted,
ii. Since the 4th respondent has accepted the offence made by him, action
5
has been initiated against him under section 21(5) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 for the contravention of Sub-section (1) and (1A) of section 4 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957.
Section 21 of Sub-section (5) of Mines and Minerals
(Development and Regulation) Act 1957 is read as follows:
“(5) Whenever any person raises, without any lawful authority, any mineral from any land, the State Government may recover from such person the mineral so raised, or, where such mineral has already been disposed of, the price thereof, and may also recover from such person, rent, royalty or tax, as the case may be, for the period during which the land was occupied by such person without any lawful authority.”
iii. Accordingly, an amount of Rs.29,00,160/- has been calculated and fixed as cost of mineral @ the rate of 380/cu.m as per G.O.(D).107, Industries (MMC2) Department dated 06.07.2017 and Rs.4,50,288/- as Seigniorage fees @ the rate of Rs.59/cu.m as per the Appendix I-A of Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules 1959 for the quantum of 7632 cu.m of rough stone illegally quarried and transported in the SF.No.25/2.
iv. For the violation of non-providing safety distance for the
current lease quarry in SF.No.65/6 to the abutting lease expired quarry, an amount of Rs.4,51,000/- has been fixed as non refundable deposit to the District Mineral Foundation Trust, established at District Level for the welfare of mine affected areas/mine affected people.
6
v. As of, a total amount of Rs.38,01,448/- has been levied/fixed
and orders has been passed vide District Collector's proceedings Rc.No.379/Kanimam/2019 dated 15.07.2019 against the 4th respondent and directed to remit the same in the appropriate head of accounts.
vi. As directed, the 4th respondent has remitted the above said amounts through Demand Drafts bearing No.20C 955939, 4TL 955940 and 4TL 955941 dated 30.07.2019, and the same has been realized and deposited in the appropriate head of accounts and the savings Bank of account of District Mineral Foundation Trust.
8. In view of the above, as directed by the Hon'ble High Court, appropriate order has been passed against the 4th respondent in accordance with the Act and rules and government orders passed from time to time regarding illegal quarrying of mines within the time prescribed by the Hon'ble High Court.
Hence, the Hon'ble Court may kindly accept the compliance report and
pass appropriate orders as the court may deem fit and render justice.
Sd/COLLECTOR Solemnly affirmed at Chennai Tiruvannamalai District on this 7th day of August 2019 Tiruvannamalai and signed his name in my presence Before Me
Sd/Assistant Director Dept.of Geology & Mining Thiruvannamalai District.
7
writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
( S.M.K.,J) (S.P.,J)
08.08.2019
dpq
S.MANIKUMAR, J
8
AND SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
dpq
WP.No.14250 of 2019
08.08.2019
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the District Collector has complied with the High Court order regarding illegal quarrying and passed appropriate orders against the lessee.
The quantum of fines and charges to be levied for illegal extraction of minerals and violation of safety distances.
Whether the payment of imposed amounts by the respondent fulfills the compliance requirements of the writ petition.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Thiru.Parthiban S/o.Perumal
District Collector, Tiruvannamalai
Thiru.B.Dheenan
S.MANIKUMAR
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
