M.Matheswaran v. The Chief Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
No.13988 of 2019 W.P. No.13988 of 2019…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Writ Petition No.13988 of 2019
W.P. No.13988 of 2019
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN.J,
It would be advantageous for the petitioner to file a suit, in respect of the claim made in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition.
2.The learned counsel relies on certain documents. But those documents
can be considered as evidence, only subject to admissibility and relevance
and only when the same are proved in the manner known to law, which requires process of trial before the trial Court and only when the suit is instituted.
- The learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner is
in penury and could not file a suit.
4.Under the provisions of Civil Procedure Code, as an indigent person, the petitioner can institute a suit.
5.The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time for getting instructions on this issue.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court