A writ petition filed under Article 226 invoking writ of mandamus to cancel a registered sale deed was dismissed as the petitioner consented to its withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition impleading the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 03.06.2019 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU W.P. No. 13879 of 2019
S. Varalakshmi
... Petitioner
-vs-
The Sub Registrar, Adayar Sub Registrar Office, Adayar, Chennai – 600 020. ... Respondents
Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to cancel the registered sale deed bearing Doc. No. 1387/1985 dated 29.05.1985 as per the Petitioner's representation dated 11.03.2019.
For Petitioner : Mr. M. Thamizhavel For Respondents: Mr. T.M. Pappiah, Special Government Pleader O R D E R
In response to the queries raised by this Court with regard to the nature of grievance ventilated by the Petitioner in the Writ Petition, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file fresh Writ Petition for appropriate relief by impleading the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, which is a necessary party and he has made an endorsement to that effect, which is recorded.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
vjt/smv
To
The Sub Registrar, Adayar Sub Registrar Office, Adayar, Chennai – 600 020. +1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.No. 44992 W.P. No. 13879 of 2019 A.SK(10/06/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Varalakshmi
The Sub Registrar, Adayar Sub Registrar Office, Adayar, Chennai – 600 020
P.D. Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
