V.Kumar v. the Recovery Officer of
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition challenging an attachment order and seeking release of a sale document was dismissed by the High Court of Madras as infructuous due to the petitioner's own submission and endorsement.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED: 14.06.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
W.P.No.1383 of 2013 and MP No.2 of 2013
V.Kumar
...Petitioner
Vs
1. The Recovery Officer of Income Tax
Income Tax Department,
Pondicherry.
2. The Joint Sub-Registrar No.I,
O/o. The Joint Sub-Registrar No.I,
Tindivanam, Villupuram District.
- R.Muthukumarappa 4. R.Moorthy ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of attachment passed by the first respondent vide TRC.No.164/CDR dated 09.09.2011 insofar as relating to immovable property measuring an extent of 2.76 acres Agricultural Land in Survey No.15/3 and 14/3 of Kizhi Arungunam Village, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the second respondent to release the sale document to the petitioner herein registered as Document No.1400 of 2012 on the file of the second respondent dated 16.08.2012
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Kumar
- respondent
The Recovery Officer of Income Tax
- respondent
The Joint Sub-Registrar No.I
- respondent
R.Muthukumarappa
- respondent
R.Moorthy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court