Dismissed

N.Sivaraj v. District Collector

Madras HC1 Mar 2019WP/13361/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this PIL, the petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the fourth respondent not to open a TASMAC shop in a specific village survey number. The court dismissed the petition after the Respondent submitted that no shop existed at the alleged location. No costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

Prayer to direct the fourth respondent not to open a TASMAC shop at S.No.265/3A3, Thottipalayam Village was dismissed.

N.Sivaraj Vs District Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.03.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD W.P.No.13361 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.14388 of 2017

¶6

N.Sivaraj .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. District Collector,
Tirupur District, Tirupur.
2. Sub-Collector,
Tirupur Revenue Sub-Division,
Tirupur.
3. Thasildar,
Tirupur North Taluk, Tirupur.
4. Regional Manager,
TASMAC Regulated Market,
Ankeripalayam Road, Tirupur.
5. Commissioner of Police,
Tirupur City Police,
Tirupur. .. Respondents

¶7

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the fourth respondent not to open TASMAC shop in S.No.265/3A3 in Thottipalayam Village in Tirupur North Taluk in Tirupur District.

¶8

For Petitioner : Ms.J.Winny For Respondents 1 to 3&5 : Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali Government Advocate For Respondent 4 : Mr.K.Sathish Kumar Standing Counsel O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.)

¶9

Claiming himself to be a resident of Guruvayurappan Nagar, Poyampalayam, Tirupur, petitioner has filed the instant public interest litigation seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the fourth respondent not to open TASMAC shop in S.No.265/3A3 in

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

Thottipalayam Village, Tirupur North Taluk, Tirupur District.

¶12

On instructions from the Regional Manager, TASMAC Regulated Market, Ankeripalayam Road, Tirupur / fourth respondent herein, Mr.K.Sathish Kumar, learned standing counsel for TASMAC submitted that no TASMAC shop is located in S.No.265/3A3 in Thottipalayam Village, Tirupur North Taluk, Tirupur District. Learned standing counsel further submitted that Shop No.1964 is located in some other Survey Number in the same village. Submission is placed on record.

¶13

In the light of the above submission, we are of the view that the prayer sought for cannot be granted. Writ petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

¶14

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kk
To
1. District Collector,
Tirupur District, Tirupur.
2. Sub-Collector,
Tirupur Revenue Sub-Division,
Tirupur.
3. Thasildar,
Tirupur North Taluk, Tirupur.
4. Regional Manager,
TASMAC Regulated Market,
Ankeripalayam Road, Tirupur.
5. Commissioner of Police,
Tirupur City Police, Tirupur.
+1cc to Mr.A.Immanuel, Advocate, S.R.No. 19617
+1cc to Mr.K.Sathish Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No. 19219
W.P.No.13361 of 2017 and
W.M.P.No.14388 of 2017
VGN(CO)
GN(01/04/2019)

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N.Sivaraj v. District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Sivaraj v. District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Suresh babu Vs The Chairman

G.Vijayakumar Vs The Director General, (Personnel)

Gandhiya Makkal Iyakkam Vs The Cabinet Committee on

C.Jayaraj Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

A.P.Suryaprakasam, Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

S.Sekar Vs The District Collector