with one Kanjan Gopal, the father of the fourth respondent for selling the land in S.No.167/3, an extent of 1.24 acres for a consideration of Rs.4,500/. Out of the sale consideration, a sum of Rs.4,000/- was received by the executant on 14.06.1977 and that the sale deed will be registered on payment of the balance of the amount. The father of the petitioner - Krishnasamy Mudaliar, has filed O.S.No.304 of 1987 for permanent injunction against the said Kanjan Gopal from interfering with his peaceful possession. The suit was decreed on 18.03.1991. While granting the decree for permanent injunction, in clause 2 of the decree, it was stated that if the defendant therein, namely, the father of the fourth respondent pays a sum of Rs.2,500/- within a month, the said injunction order would automatically get vacated and right of the plaintiff, who is the father of the petitioner, would get cancelled. It is stated that the defendant, namely, the father of the fourth respondent, had remitted a sum of Rs.2,500/- pursuant to the direction of the Court under DR 26 dated 11.04.1991. Later, there was also a partition in the family of the said Kanjan Gopal on 29.06.2006. In the said partition, the properties shown in ‘C’ schedule was allotted to the fourth respondent herein, including an extent of 1.24 acres in S.No.167/3. Further, the fourth respondent got his name entered in the Revenue Register in respect of the said lands vide order dated 19.12.2012 passed by the third respondent.
