Disposed

Tamilnadu General Workers Union, v. The Deputy Commissioner of Labour II

Madras HC18 Jan 2019WP/1170/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Settlement reached between Tamil Nadu General Workers Union and the management under the Industrial Disputes Act. Parties filed a joint memo praying for closure of the writ petition and disposal in terms of the settlement.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was closed and disposed of in terms of the settlement arrangement between the parties.

Tamilnadu General Workers Union, Vs The Deputy… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :18-01-2019

¶2

CORAM

¶3

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.1170 of 2019

¶4

Tamil Nadu General Workers Union, 2/1 Kovur Vaithiyanathan Street, Chintadripet, Chennai-600 002 Represented by its General Secretary K.Rajagopalan alias K.Ravi. .. Petitioner vs 1.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour II, (Conciliation), Kuralagam, Chennai-600 108. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour II, (Conciliation), Kuralagam, Chennai-600 108. 3.The Management, Ananda Vikatan Printers Pvt Ltd., 99 North Phase, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Ambattur, Chennai-600 098. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to initiate conciliation proceeding based on the petition dated 29.11.2018 filed by the petitioner under Section 2(k) of I.D. Act, on 30.11.2018, by calling the third respondent for conciliation and try to arrive at an amicable settlement.

¶5

For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Kumar for M/s.S.Arunachalam Associates. For Respondents-1&2 : Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, Government Advocate. For Respondent-3 : Mr.G.Anand for M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co.

¶6

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner as well as the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents, have jointly made a submission that after filing of the present writ petition, the issues between the parties had been settled out of Court and the said Joint Memo filed by the parties to the lis on hand is extracted hereunder:-

¶9

“JOINT MEMO

¶10

The Petitioner Union and the third respondents had entered into a Settlement under Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, on 07.01.2019. A copy of the said Settlement is attached to this Memo. In terms of the Settlement, the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement with regard to all pending disputes including non-employment of workmen. It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispose of the Writ Petition in terms of the settlement and the Settlement may be made a part of this Hon'ble High Court Order. Both parties pray that the Writ Petition may be disposed of in terms of the settlement.” 2. In view of the abovesaid Joint Memo, the writ petition stands closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶11

Svn

¶12

To 1.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour II, (Conciliation), Kuralagam, Chennai-600 108.

¶13

2.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour II, (Conciliation), Kuralagam, Chennai-600 108.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

+1cc to Mr.S.Arunachalam Associates, Advocate, S.R.No.3707 +1cc to Mr.T.S.Gopalan and Co, Advocate, S.R.No.3633

¶16

W.P.No.1170 of 2019

¶17

rrs 05/02/201

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tamilnadu General Workers Union, v. The Deputy Commissioner of Labour II

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamilnadu General Workers Union, v. The Deputy Commissioner of Labour II

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ishwarchand E. Tater, Vs the Commissioner of Customs

A.J.S.Paul (Deceased) Vs the Assistant Commissioner

Dunlop India Ltd. Vs Union of India

Neyveli Lignite Corpn.Ltd., Re Vs 1.THE Secy., Edun.Dept., Govt.

M/S Balaji Forwarders Vs the Chief Commissioner of

A.Sankaranaryanan Vs the Bharathidasan University