Dismissed
H.Prasad, v. Union of India
Madras HCWP/10805/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Infructuous writ petition filed under Article 226 praying for quashing of departmental proceedings. Petitioners withdrew application as the prayed-for relief was already implemented.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶2
DATED : 25.10.2019
¶3
CORAM
¶4
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
¶5
W.P.No.10805 of 2005 and W.M.P.No.11725 of 2005 and W.M.P.Nos. 743&744 of 2006
¶6
- H. Prasad 2. M.Selvaraj 3. K.Madhava Rao
¶7
- A.Thulukanam
¶8
- R.Venkatesan
¶9
- M.Radhakrishnan 7. E. Christi Parimala 8. K. Srinivasan 9. P.Balasubramanian 10. P.Krishnamurthy 11. Shaik Kajavali 12. T.S.Vittoban 13. G.Rajasekar
¶10
- K.Kuppusamy 15. V.Dharmambal 16. C.A.X. Alphonse 17. V.Sivaraman 18. R.Balasubramanian 19. M.Munusamy
¶11
- Anuradha Sundararajan
¶12
- S.Vijayalakshmy 22. G.Venkatesaperumal 23. P.Sridharan 24. S.Krishnan 25. G.Parthasarathy 26. R.Chandrasekaran 27. S.Sudha 28. S.Sethu 29. N.Jayapalan 30. M.Mohan 31. N.Sundaram 32. G.Vijaya 33. M.G.Sridhar 34. T.S. Sivarajan 35. V.Chandran 36. N.Varalakshmi 37. K.Venkataramanan 38. K.Gurumurthy
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
H. Prasad and Others
- respondent
Union of India and Others
Coram
AI extract
M. Duraiswamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court