Dismissed

M/S.Glorious Exports v. Union of India

Madras HC5 Aug 2019WP/10606/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed the writ petition challenging Notification No.25 (RE-2007)/2004-2009 as infructuous because the same notification had been subject of a batch of petitions which were dismissed in 2009 (241) E.L.T. 338. Consequently, the petition stands closed without effective orders.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was closed; no costs awarded. Connected miscellaneous petition also closed.

M/S.Glorious Exports Vs Union of India — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 05.08.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

¶5

W.P.No.10606 of 2008

¶6

and M.P.No.1 of 2008

¶7

M/s.Glorious Exports, Rep. by its Proprietor Mr.Jitendra Kumar Modi, 163, Rabindra Sarani,

Kolkata - 700007.

...Petitioner

Union of India,

¶12

Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi - 110001.

¶13

The Director General of Foreign Trade, and Ex-Officio Additional Secretary to Government of India, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi - 110001.

¶14

The Commissioner of Customs (Seaport-Imports), No.60, Rajaji Salai, Custom House, Chennai - 600001. ...Respondents

¶15

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Declaration, declaring the impugned Notification No.25 (RE-2007)/2004-2009 dated 29.08.2007, issued from file No.01/89/180/0043/AM01/PC-1A of the second respondent as ultra vires, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of the rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and Article 301 of the Constitution of India.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Jayaraj

¶17

For Respondents: Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao, SCGSC

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The impugned Notification No.25 (RE-2007)/2004-2009, dated 29.08.2007 was a subject matter of batch of writ petitions reported in 2009 (241) E.L.T. 338 (Mad.) in the case of Unik Traders vs. Union of India, and this Court had dismissed the same by its order dated 05.12.2008. Since the same notification is under challenge in the present writ petition also, no contrary view can be taken on the same and as such, no effective orders can be passed in the present writ petition, since the prayer itself has become infructuous.

¶21

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶22

s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
hvk
To
1. The Secretary,
Union of India,
Ministry of Commerce and Industry,
Department of Commerce,
Udyog Bhavan,
New Delhi - 110001.
2. The Director General of Foreign Trade,
Ex-Officio Additional Secretary,
Government of India,
Udyog Bhavan,
New Delhi - 110001.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Customs,
Group - 1,
No.60, Rajaji Salai, Custom House,
Chennai – 600001.
+1 CC to Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao, Advocate sr 66763.
W.P.No.10606 of 2008
and
M.P.No.1 of 2008
CA(CO)
SP(17/09/2019)

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Glorious Exports v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Glorious Exports v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Rajeshwari Vs the Deputy Commissioner of

Mr.v.Rajkumar Vs Union of India

The Federation of Madras Vs Union of India

Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Vs Commissioner of Customs

M/S.Om Associates Vs Union of India

M/S. v M Retreads Vs Asst. Commissioner of Central