Disposed

S.Ramachandran v. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies

Madras HC8 Apr 2019WP/10473/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras disposed of a writ petition wherein petitioners sought a direction to respondents to consider their joint representation for clearing loan dues to facilitate pension withdrawal without adjudicating the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioners' joint representation of 14.03.2018 and pass appropriate orders expeditiously, preferably within six weeks.

S.Ramachandran Vs The Registrar of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 08.04.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

¶5

W.P.No.10473 of 2019

¶6

1.S.Ramachandran
2.M.Renu
3.T.E.Sekaran ..Petitioners
Vs.
1.The Registrar of Co-operative Societies,
Kilpauk,
Chennai - 10.
2.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies,
Cheyyar,
Thiruvannamalai District.
3.The Tahsildar,
Cheyyar Taluk,
Tiruvannamalai District.
4.The Tahsildar,
Vembakkam Taluk,
Tiruvannamalai District.
5.The Secretary,
Cheyyar Revenue Division Revenue Department,
Employers Co-operative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd.,
Vandavasi - 604 408.
Tiruvannamalai District. ..Respondents

¶7

Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first and second respondents herein to consider the joint representation of the petitioners dated 14.03.2018 to furnish the details of the amount deducted and paid by the third and fourth respondents herein to the credit of loan amount borrowed by the petitioners; to furnish statement of accounts and issue no objection certificate for conferring the monthly pension.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

For Petitioners :Mr.R.S.Anandan

¶10

For Respondents :Ms.T.Girija

¶11

Government Advocate for R1 & R2

¶12

Mr.V.Shanmugasundar Special Government Pleader for R3 & R4

¶13

Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram

¶14

Special Government Pleader for R5

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

Ms.T.Girija, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2; Mr.V.Shanmugasundar, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 3 and 4; Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the fifth respondent. By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶17

The prayer in the Writ Petition is for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first and second respondents to consider the joint representation of the petitioners, dated 14.03.2018 to furnish the details of the amount deducted and paid by the third and fourth respondents to the credit of loan amount borrowed by the petitioners; to furnish statement of accounts and issue no objection certificate for conferring the monthly pension.

¶18

According to the petitioners, they made joint representation to the first and second respondents on 14.03.2018 for furnishing the statement of accounts for the loan borrowed by them and for issuance of no objection certificate to the petitioners so as to enable them to get the pensionary benefits. According to the petitioners, except provident fund, they have not received any pensionary benefits. Though the petitioners made representation on 14.03.2018, till date no order has been passed. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

¶19

The learned Special Government Pleader and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that respondents will consider the representation of the petitioners in accordance with law.

¶20

In the light of the submissions and also considering the limited scope of prayer sought for in this writ petition, this Court, without going into merits of the case, directs the second respondent to consider the joint representation of the petitioners dated 14.03.2018 and pass appropriate orders on

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There is no order as to costs.

¶24

s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
r n s
To
1.The Registrar of Co-operative Societies,
Kilpauk,
Chennai - 10.
2.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies,
Cheyyar,
Thiruvannamalai District.
3.The Tahsildar,
Cheyyar Taluk,
Tiruvannamalai District.
4.The Tahsildar,
Vembakkam Taluk,
Tiruvannamalai District.
5.The Secretary,
Cheyyar Revenue Division Revenue Department,
Employers Co-operative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd.,
Vandavasi - 604 408.
Tiruvannamalai District.
+1 CC to Mr.R.S.Anandan, Advocate sr 34151.
+1 CC to Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram, Advocate sr 34471.
+1 CC to Spl. Govt. Pleader sr 34322
W.P.No.10473 of 2019
RR(CO)
SP(14/05/2019)

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Ramachandran v. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Ramachandran v. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ved Pal Boora Vs the Director General

S.Jaffer Ali Vs The District Collector Cum Arbitrator

G.Anandaraj Vs The Regional Transport Officer

S.Govindhan Vs The District Collector

A.N.Parthasarathy, Vs The Member

Mrs.P.Jamuna Vs the Chairman