The court disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking to quash proceedings. The petitioner surrendered the petition as infructuous, resulting in the court dismissing the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.09.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 10115 of 2019
and
W.M.P. Nos. 10678 and 10681 of 2019
K. Zahooruddin ...Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records from the First Respondent and to quash the proceedings in Proc. 10025/B9/2009/Che dated 01.04.2019.
For Petitioner : Mr. T. Velumani For Respondents: Mr. V. Raghavachari (For R1) Mr. S. Chandrasekaran (For R2) O R D E R
Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that the relief sought in this Writ Petition has become infructuous and made an endorsement to that effect.
gsa
Sd/Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Chief Executive Officer Tamil Nadu Wakf Board No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street Vallal Seethakathi Nagar Chennai – 600 001.
+1cc to Mr.V.Raghavachari, Advocate, SR.No.80916
W.P. No. 10115 of 2019
Kak(27/09/2019)
K. Zahooruddin
The Chief Executive Officer Tamil Nadu Wakf Board No.1
M.A. Syed Ahamed Hussain Khaderi
P.D. Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
